Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Armour & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1937No. 30200PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Arthur B. Cunningham appeals because dissatisfied with a compensation award made in the district court. On August 6, 1934, plaintiff was working as a plumber or steam-fitter in the basement below the engine room at the packing plant of Armour & Company at South Omaha.' There is no question that he was an employee and, if injured, was injured in the course of his employment.

About 10:30 on the morning named, a pipe (containing ammonia under pressure) on the outside of the building in which plaintiff was working, and about 35 feet above the ground level, broke and caused ammonia fumes to enter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Saxton v. Sinclair Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Shafer v. Beatrice State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Greusel v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. ParmelyNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. City of Wilber v. BednarNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Benson v. JarvisIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Beam v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Cole v. Cushman Motor Works, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ames v. Sanitary District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Dietz v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API