Bartlett v. Eaton
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Begley, District Judge.
This is an action under the workmen’s compensation act wherein George Bartlett, an employee, asked to invoke the provisions of the act because of injuries received by him while in the employ of Arthur Eaton. Arthur A. Kneeland, a general contractor, had the contract to remodel a store building at Fifteenth and 0 streets, Lincoln, Nebraska. Arthur Eaton, a plasterer, was employed to do the plastering. George Bartlett was one of the men employed by Eaton as a plasterer. On November 8, 1929, Eaton and men had brought a lot of scaffolding, preparatory to getting ready to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Standard Oil Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by33 opinions
- Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Welke v. City of AinsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- Saxton v. Sinclair Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- Price v. Burlington Refrigerator Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Mullen v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.