Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Bulla

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1950No. 379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oubiam.

The election plaintiff seeks to enjoin was beld 25 March 1950 and is now an accomplished fact. Hence the question he seeks to present on this appeal is academic. For that reason the appeal is dismissed on authority of Nance v. Winston-Salem, 229 N.C. 732, 51 S.E. 2d 185, and Eller v. Wall, 229 N.C. 359, 49 S.E. 2d 758.

Appeal dismissed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eller v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Nance v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. RiddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Austin v. County of DareSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Ratcliff v. RodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Green v. BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API