Legal Opinion

Eller v. . Wall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

It was admitted on the argument that the election which the plaintiffs sought to enjoin was held on 28 August, 1948. As the action which the plaintiffs desired to prevent has already been taken, the question presented by the appeal from the ruling dissolving the restraining order has become academic, and the appeal will be dismissed in accordance with the practice prevailing in such instances. Efird v. Comrs. of Forsyth, 217 N. C., 691, 9 S. E. (2d), 466; Rousseau v. Bullis, 201 N. C., 12, 158 S. E., 553. Since the sole object of the litigation was the enjoining of the election and since this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. . BullisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Efird v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. RiddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ratcliff v. RodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Saunders v. BullaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Green v. BriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API