Legal Opinion
Ratcliff v. Rodman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 31, 1962No. 31PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The question plaintiff seeks to present on this appeal is academic. The sole relief sought by plaintiff is the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring the Beaufort County Board of Elections “to permit the filing of plaintiff for the nomination of the Republican Party as Representative of Beaufort County in the Lower House of the General Assembly of the State of North Carolina without the necessity of taking” the pledge as provided for in G.S. 163-119. In short, he desires to be a candidate in the Primary Election of 26 May 1962. That Election has been held. Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rousseau v. . BullisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Efird v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Saunders v. BullaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Eller v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Nance v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Goad v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Fulton v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.