Austin v. County of Dare
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The court below denied plaintiffs’ application for a temporary restraining order, thus deciding the only question presented at the hearing. Thereafter, Dare County conveyed the lands to the United States of America for the consideration of $50,000.00. It was so stated upon the argument here. The sale and conveyance having been consummated, whether Judge Carr should have restrained the defendants, pen-dente lite, is now an academic question. It is quite obvious that a court cannot restrain the doing of that which has been already consummated. Surety Corp. v. Sharpe, 233 N.C. 644, 65 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Efird v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Saunders v. BullaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Savage v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
3Cited by17 opinions
- Citizens Addressing Reassignment & Education, Inc. v. Wake County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Goad v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Fulton v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Town of Nags Head v. TillettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re HackleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.