Ferguson v. Riddle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
The court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for a restraining order enjoining the election called to be held 26 August on the question of legalizing the sale of beer and wine in Moore County. Thereafter the election was held and the vote was against the sale of beer and wine. The defendants insist that the questions raised by the plaintiffs’ appeal have now become academic. Saunders v. Bulla, 232 N.C. 578; Eller v. Wall, 229 N.C. 359, 49 S.E. 2d 758; Penland v. Gowan, 229 N.C. 449, 50 S.E. 2d 182; S. v. Cochran, 230 N.C. 523, 53 S.E. 2d 663. But we think the decisions cited are not controlling on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Saunders v. BullaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Eller v. . WallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Penland v. . GowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Clark's Greenville, Inc. v. WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- PARKDALE AMERICA, LLC v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Robinson v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.