Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Bank of Bladenboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

It was agreed that the court below should find the facts. We are bound by the findings if there is sufficient competent evidence to support them, which we think there is.

The first question involved: Did the defendant, as plaintiff’s agent, violate the trust imposed in it by the plaintiff in acceptance of $1,500.25 and delivery of the draft for $1,884.22 with the bill of lading to Bladen-boro Cotton Mills? We think it did.

The plaintiff, Roy Lawson, sold to G. W. Branch fifty bales of cotton for $1,884.22. Branch sold the cotton to the Bladenboro Cotton Mills, and drew a sight draft for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atlantic & North Carolina Railroad v. Atlantic & North Carolina Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Aydlett v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Waggoner v. Western Carolina Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Armstrong v. . LononSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Davis Sulphur Ore Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Keith v. GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Henderson v. JimmersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Company v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Durant v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API