Durant v. . Powell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.
Did the trial judge commit reversible error? We think not. This is the plaintiff’s only statement of the question involved. The cause of action instituted by plaintiff against defendants is bottomed on the following allegations in the complaint: “He performed overtime service for the defendants consisting of 2,124 hours, and for which the defendants are indebted to him at the rate of 71c per hour, amounting to a total of $1,508.04.”
In answer to this the defendants say: “That the plaintiff was employed for a period of eight (8) hours service, said period under the terms and conditions of his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kerr v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Belk's Department Store v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- N. & W. Overall Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Austin v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Long v. Town of RockinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Prentzas v. PrentzasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Cap Care Group, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.