Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Bradley Transp. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1949No. 10738, 10739PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Circuit Judge.
The instant appeal and cross-appeal attack a judgment in an action at law growing out of a collision at the plaintiff’s River Rouge plant between a steamer owned and operated by the defendant and a coal .and ore unloader belonging to the plaintiff.
The complaint, in. addition to claiming damages for the destruction of a Hulett unloader, averred that the plaintiff’s Mead-Morrison coal bridge was struck and damaged, and that substantial damage was done to the track rails, snubbing post, concrete wall, concrete on the face of the dock, railroad tracks, the hot rail and guard.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Inland & Seaboard Coasting Co. v. TolsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bunge Corp. v. M/V Furness BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. The S/s Hermosa, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., in Rem, Pansuiza Compania De Navigacion S.A., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Campins v. CapelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dillingham Shipyard v. Associated Insulation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.