Darling Milling Co. v. Chapman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by the Darling Milling Company against Robert A. Chapman and others, copartners as the R. A. Chapman Hay Company, for the breach of a contract for the purchase of hay. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiffs sued defendants to recover damages for the breach of a written contract. The case was appealed to the circuit court, where it was tried by the judge without a jury, who rendered a judgment in favor of the defendants. The case is brought here by writ of error.
The record discloses that in December, 1900, plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendants to sell them ten cars of hay. One car load was sent forward. A draft was drawn upon defendants, and was paid. It was the claim of plaintiff that afterwards some cars were loaded with hay, which Mr. Robert Chapman, acting for *685de…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neumann v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Schuler v. EckertMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoffman v. SilverthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Nelson v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Lasley v. PrestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Oregon Auto-Dispatch v. Port. Cordage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908