Legal Opinion

Sugg v. North Carolina Agricultural Credit Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: Conceding, without deciding, that the cashier of the Snow Hill Banking and Trust Company was not authorized by the payee to endorse the check in question, still we think the plaintiff must fail in his suit, if not upon the principle of ratification, then upon the doctrine of estoppel. The law will not permit him to take and to hold the fruits of what was done for him by the cashier of the bank and at the same time repudiate its consequences. Bank v. Justice, 157 N. C., 373, 72 S. E., 1016.

The substance of ratification is confirmation after conduct. 2 C.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Gallup v. County of LibertyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Waggoner v. Western Carolina Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Lewis v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Southwest National Bank v. JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Rand v. . GilletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Branch Banking & Trust Company v. GillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Yancey v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API