Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Watkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 23, 1968No. 689SC271PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

The first question presented by this appeal is whether the pleadings and evidence offered by the appellants, when taken in the light most favorable to them, are sufficient to sustain the doctrine of equitable estoppel and thus withstand a motion for nonsuit.

The essentials of an equitable estoppel (also known as estoppel in pais) are set forth in the case of Boddie v. Bond, 154 N.C. 359, 70 S.E. 824, as follows:

“1. Words or conduct by the party against whom the estoppel is alleged, amounting to a misrepresentation or concealment of material facts.
“2. The party against whom the estoppel is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hawkins v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Volkman v. DP ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Meachan v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Meacham v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Hill v. Town of HillsboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Gladden v. Pargas, Inc. of WaldorfCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API