Legal Opinion

Rand v. . Gillette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1930PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. 3".

Tbe judgment must be affirmed on authority of what was said in Distributing Co. v. Carraway, 196 N. C., 58, 144 S. E., 535. A party is not permitted to take a position in a subsequent judicial proceeding which conflicts with a position taken by bim in a former judicial proceeding, when tbe latter position disadvantages his adversary. Hardison v. Everett, 192 N. C., 371, 135 S. E., 288.

Tbe plaintiff is face to face with- tbe lesson, taught every day in tbe school of experience, tbat be cannot safely “run with tbe hare and bunt with tbe bound.” He induced tbe court to adjudge tbe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Hardison v. . EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Sugg v. North Carolina Agricultural Credit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Crawford v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Gottesman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API