Legal Opinion

Ward v. Johns Hopkins University

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 22, 1994No. Civ. A. WN-92-3617PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court are Defendant’s Motions for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Cusimano and Ward (Papers Nos. 65 and 66) and Defendant’s Motion for Severance (Paper No. 54). Plaintiffs have opposed the motions and Defendant has replied. Upon a review of the motions and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6), that Defendant’s motions for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part, and Defendant’s motion for severance will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs in this case,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Disparte v. Corporate Executive BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. Howze v. Virginia PolytechnicDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995
  3. Perryman v. WestDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
  4. Etefia v. East Baltimore Community Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
  5. Brown v. Worthington Steel, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API