Citizens for Amending Proposition v. City of Pomona
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
*1165In June 1993, appellant City of Pomona (Pomona) entered into an agreement with non-party Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Regency). Pursuant to that agreement, Regency erected advertising billboards alongside several Pomona freeways. Shortly thereafter, in November 1993, the citizens of Pomona passed a ballot initiative, Proposition L (Prop. L), which prohibited the construction of additional billboards within city limits.
Pomona's agreement with Regency expired by its terms in June 2014. In July 2014, the Pomona city council adopted an ordinance purporting to amend the agreement by…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Workman v. Colichman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Center for Genetics and Society v. Bonta CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Colin Raker Dickey v. Warden of Pelican Bay State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Dalrada Financial Corporation v. Deprey CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Diaz v. Sohnen EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.