Legal Opinion
Mooney v. Ingram
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 21, 1977No. 19014PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
Richard Ingram sued Henry English on a written contract for a share of the profits on sale of a ranch. The contract provides that English would reserve from the sale a part of the ranch on which the improvements were located, to be determined by a survey. No survey was made, and English later sold the entire ranch, but refused to pay Ingram any part of the profits. After suit was filed, English died and the suit proceeded against his executor. The trial court rendered judgment against the executor, based on a jury verdict, for $249,527.93, representing one-fourth of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morgan v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Berne v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Stekoll Petroleum Co. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. SidranCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Hume v. BogleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Burnside Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. v. T.S. Young Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003
- Wiley v. BertelsenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Gerdes v. Mustang Exploration Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- R.I.O. Systems, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.