Legal Opinion

Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort Worth

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2000No. 98-1138PublishedCited by 422 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

From 1937 to 1992, a Fort Worth city ordinance required Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. to pay the City, “in lieu of’ all charges, fees, and taxes owed for its location of poles, wires, and other facilities on city property, a percentage of its gross receipts from the rendition of local service. A separate ordinance provided that the City would apportion Bell’s payments between itself and the Fort Worth Independent School District. The School District sued the City and Bell for breach of their obligations under these ordinances and for the City’s breach of a separate agreement to continue the…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El PasoTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by422 opinions

  1. The City of Houston v. Steve WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kirby Lake Development, Ltd. v. Clear Lake City Water AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. City of Galveston v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fischer v. CTMI, L.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Wasson Interests, Ltd. v. City of Jacksonville, TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2016

417 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API