Legal Opinion

Stekoll Petroleum Co. v. Hamilton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1953No. A-3795PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

The District Court rendered summary judgment that plaintiffs Harold H. Hamilton and J. R. Rich, respondents herein, take nothing by their suit against defendant Stekoll Petroleum Company, petitioner in this Court. The Court of Civil Appeals, holding that the contract on which the suit is based sufficiently complies with the statute of frauds and that there are issues of fact to be determined, reversed the judgment of the District Court and remanded the cause. 250 S. W. 2d 645.

The suit is for the recovery of damages for breach of a contract for the conveyance or assignment of the oil and gas…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Turner v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Radford v. McNenyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  5. Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StetsonTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Eland Energy, Inc. v. Rowden Oil & Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. Nash v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Tiller v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Foster v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API