Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Young

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 21, 1947No. 4386PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

E. D. Morgan, referred to hereinafter as plaintiff, brought this action against Danis Young, referred to hereinafter as defendant, to recover the sum owed on the promissory note of August 10, 1944, quoted below, and also to foreclose two liens securing this note, to wit, a deed of trust on defendant’s farm in Newton county and a chattel mortgage on five per cent of defendant’s 1944 and 1945 rice crops grown on that farm. By amendment, plaintiff limited his prayer for foreclosure to the deed of trust.

Defendant filed an answer, and also filed a cross action against plaintiff…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. United States v. SpeedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. International & Great Northern Railroad v. PapeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cox, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Neeley v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Ski River Development, Inc. v. McCalla, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  4. Malaker Corp. Stockholders Protective Committee v. First Jersey National BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Texas Commerce Bank Reagan Ex Rel. Texas Commerce Bank National Ass'n v. Lebco Constructors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API