Legal Opinion
Karp v. Redevelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 22, 1989No. 286 C.D. 1989, 287 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Judge.
The Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia (RDA), appellee, invited bids in October of 1985 for the purchase and development of a piece of real estate in the University City Urban Renewal area. The bidding requirements contained in the bid invitation included an obligation to deposit ten percent of the bid price and a statement that it is the developer’s responsibility to document its financial capability to undertake the project. After the bids were submitted, they were forwarded to the Technical Evaluation Committee (TEC) which examined the bids and made a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Whitemarsh Township Authority v. Finelli Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lynch v. Urban Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Shaeffer v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Kimmel v. Lower Paxton TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Glasgow, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Smith v. Borough of East StroudsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.