Legal Opinion

Smith v. Borough of East Stroudsburg

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1997No. Nos. 3209 C.D. 1996 and 3210 C.D. 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.

These are separate appeals by the Borough of East Stroudsburg (Borough) and J.P. Mascaro and Sons, Inc. (Mascaro), which have been consolidated, from an October 31, 1996 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court) denying their separate, but same, motions for post-trial relief, and affirming its order of August 7, 1996 granting the request of Richard F. Smith, Grand Central Sanitation, Inc. (Grand Central Sanitation), and Grand Central Sanitary Landfill, Inc. (Grand Central Landfill) for a permanent injunction.1

The factual and procedural history…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pikur Enterprises, Inc. v. Commonwealth Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Karp v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Nielson v. WomerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Philadelphia v. CANTEEN, DIV. OF TW SER.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Fedorko Properties, Inc. v. Millcreek Township School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Dunbar v. Downington Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Perry Construction Group, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API