Legal Opinion

Whitemarsh Township Authority v. Finelli Bros.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1962No. Appeal, No. 218PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

Whitemarsh Township Authority (hereinafter referred to as the Authority) created pursuant to the Municipality Authorities Act of May 2, 1945, P. L. 382, §10, as amended, 53 P.S. §312, by public advertisement *375invited the submission of sealed bids to enter into a written contract for the construction of a sanitary sewer system in the township. The return date was February 13, 1958.

The instructions to bidders contained in Section 10 the following: “10. Form of Proposal All bids must be submitted on one of the two separately bound pamphlets containing a copy of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Harris v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Colella v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Lebowitz v. Keystate Insurance Agency, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Spawglass Construction Corp. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Gaeta v. Ridley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Hatalowich v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Pollin v. Mindy Mfg. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Skrocki v. CaltabianoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API