Legal Opinion
United States v. Lambert
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided January 31, 1996No. Civil Action 2:94-1012PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending is the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability. Defendants have not responded and the motion is ripe for determination. 1 Based upon the absence of a genuine issue of material fact and the law, the Court GRANTS the motion.
Under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is proper only:
“If the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Custer v. Pan American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEST INDIES TRANSPORT, INC.; WIT EQUIPMENT CO., INC.; And W. JAMES OELSNER, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Assateague Coastkeeper v. Alan & Kristin Hudson FarmDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. KovichDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Lake Tahoe Watercraft v. Tahoe Regional PlanningDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.