Legal Opinion
Lake Tahoe Watercraft v. Tahoe Regional Planning
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 28, 1998No. CIV. S-97-2053 FCD DJDPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAMRELL, District Judge.
The Lake Tahoe Watercraft Recreation Association and various watercraft manufacturers, retailers and users bring this action challenging the legality of Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”) Ordinance No. 97-12 (“Ordinance”). In particular, plaintiffs challenge the portion of the Ordinance prohibiting the discharge of unburned fuel and oil from the operation of watercraft propelled by carbureted two-stroke engines commencing June 1,1999.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges: violations of the equal protection, due process, and commerce clauses of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Pahk v. HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Engle v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
- Fielder v. GehringDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.