Katenkamp v. Union Realty Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action in equity for a mandatory injunction to compel the removal of groins erected on littoral lands. A demurrer was sustained to plaintiffs’ first amended complaint and, upon failure to further amend within the allowed time, a judgment was entered for defendant, from which plaintiffs appealed.
The first amended complaint in substance alleges: That plaintiffs and defendant are owners of adjoining tracts of land bordering on Miramar Bay, an inlet of the Pacific Ocean, at Santa Barbara, defendant’s property being upon the westerly arm of the bay, west of plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
- Lebrun v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Brown v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.