Legal Opinion
Mamantov v. Jackson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 15, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-0407PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Andrew Mamantov brings this action against the defendant asserting claims for retaliation and discrimination based on age and sex in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2006), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-l to -17 (2006), respectively. Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. Currently before the Court is the Defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. Upon careful…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ellison v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Peyus v. LahoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Behrens v. TillersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- McDaniel v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Brown v. WolfDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.