Katkish v. Pearce
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Katkish contends that the trial court erred when it granted Pearce’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether there was an easement on Katkish’s property in favor of Pearce. We affirm.
The facts in this case are as follows. The houses located at 1208 and 1210 30th Street, N.W. are owned by Katkish and Pearce respectively. These buildings are attached at the upper levels with a walkway between the buildings at the ground level. The question of who can use this walkway is the contested issue in this litigation.
The two buildings in question had been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Townsend v. CableCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Garza v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Procacci v. ZaccoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Aszmus v. NelsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Michael J. Uhes, Ph.D., P.C., Profit Sharing Plan & Trust v. BlakeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Kayfirst Corp. v. Washington Terminal Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.