Legal Opinion

Aszmus v. Nelson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1987No. S-1783PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

John and Lillian Aszmus sued Mike Nelson to enjoin him from blocking a right-of-way easement they claimed over his land. The Aszmuses argued that a prior deed in Nelson’s chain of title created an easement in their favor because it conveyed the land "subject to” a described right-of-way. The trial court held that, as a matter of law, the deed could not create an easement. Therefore, the court entered summary judgment in favor of Nelson. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. FACTS

Both Nelson’s lot and the Aszmuses’ lot were originally part of Government Lot 32, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomson v. WadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In re the Estate of EckartNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Medhus v. DutterMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Townsend v. CableCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bolan v. Avalon Farms Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Camino Sin Pasada Neighborhood Ass'n v. RockstrohNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Springob v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Nelson v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API