Legal Opinion
Lovell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 18, 2006No. 04-1429PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs below, Lois Lovell and Floyd Gibson, 1 brought a putative class action lawsuit in Colorado state court seeking reimbursement from their automobile insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), for the diminution in value of their vehicles. Lovell and Gibson were involved in separate automobile collisions in which their vehicles were damaged. Each vehicle was insured by State Farm and it reimbursed Lovell and Gibson for repairs to their respective vehicles, but Lovell and Gibson sought additional reimbursement for the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation. Appeals of Robert A. HugginsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Finstuen v. CrutcherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Breakman v. AOL LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Frederick v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- MacArthur v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Tooele County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.