Legal Opinion
Bruce Rozet v. City Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1994No. 92-56584PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 F.3d 249
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Bruce ROZET; Deane Earl Ross, Associated Financial
Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY INSURANCE CO.; National Union Fire Insurance Company
of Pittsburgh, PA; Scottsdale Insurance Company,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-56584.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 6, 1994.
Decided April 15, 1994.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- George R. Chamberlain, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Allstate Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hogan v. Midland National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Titan Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Stoiber v. HoneychuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New Castle County De v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- New Castle County De v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- New Castle County v. Natl Union Fire InsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001