Legal Opinion

Litchfield v. Retirement Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 5, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiffs are court officers of the Superior Court in Middlesex County. They were appointed under the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 221, § 70, and predecessor statutes. The defendants are the members of the retirement board of that county under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 32, § 25F, inserted by St. 1936, c. 400, § 1, and the defendant Howard is also the treasurer of the county.

*474The issue is whether by the force of applicable statutes the plaintiffs have become members of the retirement system or systems now operative in that county (see G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 32, § 251, inserted by St. 1936, c.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Connell v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Russell v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Robert T. Merrill v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Caswell v. Somerville Retirement SystemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Davis v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API