Caswell v. Somerville Retirement System
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The seven plaintiffs appeal from an interlocutory decree sustaining a demurrer, and from a final decree dismissing their bill, which sets forth the following facts. Before December 27, 1930, they were appointed and confirmed as provided in the charter of Somerville (St. 1899, c. 240, § 21) as police officers, and took oath as such. If they had performed daily routine service as police officers prior to January 1, 1931, there was a sufficient unexpended balance of appropriation to pay them, and they would have been paid. But they performed no such service and were not paid. Their daily routine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Dunn v. Commissioner of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Rich v. Mayor of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Crimmins v. Highway Commission of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Adams v. Selectmen of NorthbridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Thibeault v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Davis v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Wise v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.