Legal Opinion
Robert T. Merrill v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 13, 1964No. 95-63PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge:
Beginning in 1906 as a midshipman, plaintiff served actively in the Navy until November 1919 when he entered the inactive naval reserve. He left the naval reserve in November 1923. In April 1942 he became a lieutenant commander in the Coast Guard reserve and served actively until 1950. Because he was required to leave the reserve when he reached 62 (on July 20, 1950), he applied in that year for retirement under what is now 10 U.S.C. § 6323 (then Section 6 of the Act of February 21, 1946, 60 Stat. 26, 27, made applicable to the Coast Guard Reserve by 14 U.S.C. § 755(e)). 1 That…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. JansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Litchfield v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Carhart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
3Cited by8 opinions
- Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Montilla v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Mary L. FAGNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Cantwell v. County of San MateoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Margaret E. Schellfeffer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.