Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Retirement Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a suit in equity wherein the plaintiff seeks to compel recognition by various city and county officers of his position as clerk of the Municipal Court of the Roxbury District of the City, of Boston. The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts. It appears that he is and has been for many years last past the duly qualified clerk of said court. On the twenty-third day of December, 1923, he was reappointed as such clerk for a term of five years. *405Pursuant to such reappointment he was duly confirmed, qualified, and entered upon the performance of his duties. At that time he was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Attorney General v. TillinghastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Opinion of Justices to the Senate & House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. State Board of Retirement v. BulgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. PentaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  5. Warner v. Selectmen of AmherstMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API