Legal Opinion

Hinckley v. Retirement Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 16, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiffs as to whom the bill was not dismissed, (hereinafter called the plaintiffs), regular police officers of the city of Gloucester, by a bill in equity seek to require the defendants, one of whom is city auditor, one of whom is city treasurer, and all of whom are members of the local retirement board, to remove the plaintiffs’ names as members of the contributory retirement system, to enjoin the defendants from deducting sums from their salaries for the purposes of such system, and to recover deductions already made. A demurrer to the bill of complaint was overruled. The case was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Commonwealth v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Commissioners of Public Works v. Cities Service Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Cohen v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Saint Luke's Hospital v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Commonwealth v. WatsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. ClubMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Commonwealth v. BartlettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API