Daniel v. Paul
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
Petitioners, Negro residents of Little Rock, Arkansas, brought this class action in the District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas to enjoin respondent from denying them admission to a recreational facility called Lake Nixon Club owned and operated by respondent, Euell Paul, and his wife. The complaint alleged that Lake Nixon Club was a “public accommodation” subject to the provisions of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 243, 42 U. S. C. § 2000a et seq., and that respondent violated the Act in refusing petitioners admission solely on racial grounds.1 After trial, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hamm v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Miller v. Amusement Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Fazzio Real Estate Co., Inc. v. Samuel AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Evans v. Laurel Links, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Frizell Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network Cult Awareness Network, Los Angeles Chapter Cynthia Kisser Priscilla CoatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.