Hamm v. City of Rock Hill
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
These are “sit-in” cases that came here from the highest courts of South Carolina and Arkansas, respectively. Each of those courts affirmed convictions based upon state' trespass statutes against petitioners, who are Negroes, for participating in “sit-in” démonstrations in the luncheon facilities of retail stores in their respective States^ We granted certiorari in each of the cases, 377 U. S. 988, 989, and consolidated them for argument. The petitioners asserted both in the state courts and here the denial of rights, privileges, and immunities secured by the Fourteenth Amendment; in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by239 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
234 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.