Legal Opinion
Fazzio Real Estate Co., Inc. v. Samuel Adams
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1968No. 24825PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge:
Pursuant to the provisions of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Samuel Adams, a Negro, brought a class action to desegregate the facilities of Fazzio’s Bridge Bowl. 1 Following a full hearing, the court below found Fazzio’s to be a covered establishment within the meaning of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and enjoined the various appellants from withholding from or denying Samuel Adams and the class he represents full enjoyment on a racially nondiscriminatory basis of the facilities of Fazzio’s. Fazzio’s appeals from this judgment.
Fazzio’s is located…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Anne P. Newman, Sharon W. Neal and John Mungin v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation and L. Maurice BessingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. T. F. Taylor Fertilizer Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Evans v. Laurel Links, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1966
- Acme Car & Truck Rentals, Inc. v. James HooperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Joseph L. Dombrowski v. Jack Dowling and Arthur Rubloff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Daniel v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Medical Society of South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- Warfield v. Peninsula Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Seidenberg v. McSorleys' Old Ale House, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.