Legal Opinion
Frizell Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network Cult Awareness Network, Los Angeles Chapter Cynthia Kisser Priscilla Coates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1994No. 92-56066PublishedCited by 607 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Frizell Clegg sued the Cult Awareness Network, alleging discrimination on the basis of race and religion in violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a (1988). This statute prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation. 1 The district court concluded Cult Awareness was not a place of public accommodation within the meaning of the statute, and dismissed Clegg’s federal civil rights claim with prejudice and without leave to amend pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The court also dismissed, without…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by607 opinions
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- Colleen v. Ford v. Schering-Plough Corporation Schering Corporation Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. CivishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
602 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.