Legal Opinion
Roberts v. United States Jaycees
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 3, 1984No. 83-724PublishedCited by 1,896 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
This case requires us to address a conflict between a State’s efforts to eliminate gender-based discrimination against its citizens and the constitutional freedom of association asserted by members of a private organization. In the decision under review, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit concluded that, by requiring the United States Jaycees to admit women as full voting members, the Minnesota Human Rights Act violates the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the organization’s members. We noted probable jurisdiction, Gomez-Bethke v. United States Jaycees, 464 U. S. 1037 (1984),…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,896 opinions
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
1,891 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.