Legal Opinion

Kay v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1947No. S. F. No. 17387PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

In this certiorari proceeding, petitioner seeks annulment of an order of the probate court confirming the sale of his home property. The sale was made while pe*217titioner was incompetent, but he has been restored to capacity since the order of confirmation of sale. Before his commitment he used the property both as a home and as an office where he practiced as a physician.

Petitioner’s guardian sold the property under the authority of section 1530 of the Probate Code: “If ... it is for the advantage, benefit, and best interests of the estate or ward or of such members of his family as he is…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Snowball v. SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Glassgold v. GlassgoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Kramer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API