Legal Opinion

Snowball v. Snowball

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1910No. Sac. No. 1729PublishedCited by 88 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial of the issues made by the petition for the probate of the alleged will of the deceased, and the opposition thereto filed by Henry H. and Norman P. Snowball, two of her five surviving children.

There were several grounds of opposition to the probate of the alleged will, but only two were relied on at the trial, viz.: That the will was the result of undue influence exerted over the deceased by A. L. Snowball and Leutie C. Snowball, two of her children, and that the execution thereof was procured by fraud of the same parties. Upon the issue of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Estate of McDevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Herwick v. LangfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Compher v. BrowningIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. AlcaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API