Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Vernon v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1952No. L. A. 22310Published

1ConcurrenceCarter, J.

I concur in the result; that is, that all punishment imposed by the contempt judgment be remitted. But I do not agree with the reasoning upon which the conclusion is based.

This court having concluded that the injunction in this case was sufficiently certain to justify an adjudication for contempt (City of Vernon v. Superior Court, 38 Cal.2d 509 [241 P.2d 243]), and thus affirmed that adjudication, now tortures the law by saying that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to vacate and remit the punishment imposed for the contempt. That is to say: This court held in the prior…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. In Re CarboniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Lindsley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API