Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kramer v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1950No. L. A. 21455Published

1Concurrence

*163TRAYNOR, J.

I concur in the conclusion that certiorari does not lie to review the propriety of the order denying the motion to set aside the decree of distribution. A motion to set aside a judgment under section 473 is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and “it need hardly be added that on certiorari we do not review matters within the discretion of the lower court.” (Estate of Kay, 30 Cal.2d 215, 226 [181 P.2d 1]; Howard v. Superior Court, 25 Cal.2d 784, 789 [154 P.2d 849]; Spanach v. Superior Court, 4 Cal.2d 447, 450 [50 P.2d444].)

It is contended, however, that the decree…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. United States v. KnutzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Howard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API