Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1997No. 95-1884PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

This appeal calls upon us to examine R.C. 2941.25 and determine whether the two acts of oral rape at issue were properly merged by the court of appeals. We must also determine whether attempted vaginal rape and vaginal rape were properly merged by the court of appeals. For the reasons that follow, we find that the mergers were not proper and reverse the portion of the judgment of the court of appeals that pertains to merger.

R.C. 2941.25 states:

“(A) Where the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BlankenshipOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. RanceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. CabralesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API