State v. Loza
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We are required by R.C. 2929.04(A) to review Loza’s thirty-three propositions of law. Many of these legal issues have been decided in prior cases *65and will be disposed of accordingly. State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 1, 3, 520 N.E.2d 568, 570. We also must make an independent review of the record to determine whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating factors beyond a reasonable doubt. Finally, we must decide whether the sentence of death is excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases.
For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by409 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
404 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.