State v. Cabrales
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
I. Introduction
{¶ 1} The issue before the court is whether possession of a controlled substance under R.C. 2925.11(A), trafficking in a controlled substance under R.C. *552925.03(A)(1), and trafficking in a controlled substance under R.C. 2925.03(A)(2) are allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2941.25 and therefore must merge. We hold that possession and trafficking under R.C. 2925.03(A)(2) are allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2941.25(A) where both offenses involve the same substance, and in this case both offenses were committed with the same animus under R.C. 2941.25(B),…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. LewisOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. FearsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2008
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.