Legal Opinion
State v. Washington
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 2013No. 2012-1070PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Washington, 137 Ohio St.3d 427,
2013-Ohio-4982.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WASHINGTON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Washington, 137 Ohio St.3d 427,
2013-Ohio-4982.] Criminal law—Sentencing—R.C. 2941.25—Multiple counts—Merger at sentencing—Court must review entire record, including arguments and information presented at sentencing hearing, to determine whether offenses were committed separately or with separate animus. (No. 2012-1070—Submitted May 7, 2013—Decided November 14, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lorain County, No. 11CA010015,
2012-Ohio-2117.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Fannon, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Athens County2018
- State v. LeGrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.