State v. Henderson
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
Jerome Henderson appeals his convictions and sentence of death. We uphold the convictions and affirm the death sentence, for the following reasons.
I
We begin by a review of appellant's twelve propositions of law and supporting arguments.
A
Appellant’s first proposition is that the Ohio death penalty scheme is unconstitutional, for eleven separate reasons. Of these, appellant concedes that we have decided ten of them in previous decisions; appellant has raised them to preserve them for future appeals. For the reasons set forth in State v. Maurer (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 239, 15 OBR 379, 473 N.E. 2d…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.